All texts submitted to the journal are subject to review.

The review process is overseen by the subject editors, who are the members of the editorial board specialising in the fields pertaining to a given article.

The subject editor appoints two external reviewers to independently evaluate the issue. They must not be affiliated with the Institute, in which the author is employed.

The reviewers decide whether the text qualifies for publication, taking into consideration the following criteria: innovative approach to the topic acknowledging the current academic literature, appropriate methodology, the impact on the current state of research.

Each review is prepared in writing and must be ended with an unambiguous conclusion whether the text should be published or rejected.

The subject editor makes the final decision about the publication or rejection, based on the two written external

The reviews are double-blind. The reviewers and the authors do not know each other’s identities.

The reviews are confidential. Neither the author nor the other editor can be shown the contents of the given review.

All articles are published in the magazine free of charge

The average turnaround time for the editorial process is 3 months (90 days).

Research Misconduct and Academic Integrity Policy: Authors are required to state the co-authorship and contributions of all authors, including those who inspired or were utilized in the text (along with their institutional affiliations), with the primary responsibility resting on the submitting author.

The Editorial Board is committed to maintaining the highest standards of research integrity and operates under a zero-tolerance policy towards any forms of misconduct. All submitted manuscripts are screened for originality using anti-plagiarism software. The Editorial Board documents all instances of scientific misconduct (including plagiarism, self-plagiarism, data fabrication/falsification, as well as "ghostwriting" and "guest authorship") and notifies the relevant entities. In cases of suspected or alleged misconduct, the Editorial Board follows the procedures and guidelines established by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). If unethical behavior is proven post-publication, the article will be subject to a formal retraction.